Gulte Telugu news
Mahesh Babu’s “Nani” did not achieve the same success as its predecessor and struggled to connect with audiences. This outcome underscores the difficulty of recreating the magic of a beloved original, especially when facing complex narrative shifts. Director SJ Suryah opened up on the same recently.
In the first installment, the protagonist’s life was intricately intertwined with a unique twist: he transformed into a 28-year-old youth at night after living his days as an 8-year-old child. The transformative nature of this narrative formed the core of the story’s charm and intrigue.
Upon pondering the idea of a sequel, Suryah acknowledged a crucial obstacle. By the end of the first film, the young boy, who had been central to the story’s premise, had grown up. This evolution presented a conundrum: how could a sequel continue to captivate audiences while adhering to the established premise?
Suryah’s solution was innovative yet faced its own set of complications. In the envisioned sequel, the boy and his father would be perpetually aged 28 years during the day. However, during the night, the father would age to 50 years while the son would remain at 28. This novel concept aimed to preserve the essence of the original, even as the characters aged.
Yet, as Suryah confessed, it was the crafting of the daytime narrative that proved to be the stumbling block. The prospect of the girl being in love with the son and her father-in-law was a narrative challenge that Suryah believed could pose difficulties artistically and with the audience’s reception. This complex love triangle risked undermining the emotional resonance that made the first film successful.
