Go To Court Against Jagan: Ambati Advises Sharmila

Back in the day, it was the turn of Chandrababu Naidu, Pawan Kalyan and Nara Lokesh to face the relentless verbal confrontations of YSR Congress ecosystem. Almost every day, the YCP firebrands have this habit of firing against TDP and JSP heads. Now there is a new addition to the list as Sharmila is also having to face the wrath of YCP. 

Earlier in the day today, Sharmila stated that Jagan has ended up as a son who dragged his mother to court and a cruel “Menamama” who stopped his nephew and niece from getting their ancestral inheritance. 

Shortly after, Sharmila was countered by none other than Ambati Rambabu himself. He had a pretty strong set of words against Sharmila, and even had a legal suggestion to her.

“After the death of YS Rajasekhar Reddy, it was Congress and TDP, who combined illicitly to target Jagan. They succeeded in it and kept Jagan in jail for 16 months. Now this Sharmila has gone to the very same Congress and has started to play diversion politics with Chandrababu. She is acting on the interests of Chandrababu to divert political attention.”

Ambati said Sharmila comes up whenever Chandrababu is in a spot of bother. “When there was this Tirumala Laddu issue that was backfiring, Sharmila came with a press conference. Now that Chandrababu is fix again due to Waqf board, Sharmila is back with this property distribution controversy.”

Somehow, Ambati found a way to link this property dispute between Jagan and Sharmila to Chandrababu. “Chandrababu, also owns Heritage Company. But is he giving shares in this company to his two sisters?” He said. This is indirect contradiction to the fact that Sharmila had been wanting a share in YSR’s properties and not Jagan’s properties. 

Ambati closed out his statement by giving some legal advice to share. “If Sharmila really has a property dispute, then why does she not go to court? This is my advice to Sharmila. If she really feels, she needs to get some property, then she should approach the court and seek legal proceedings against Jagan.”